We've selected Bettys new hair do. |
So being the lover of Dropfleet that I am, I scabbed a lift off Joe and we went to have a day of playing with spaceships. I did some filming to give our impressions of the event and how the games were going. I also had a bit of a chat with Dave Lewis at the end of the day about his impressions of how the meta was developing and how the day went.
The Warboar venue was a really great place for the tournament, the staff were friendly and there was some lovely food available and they were happy to bring it to your table which was really nice. The shop itself is rather hilariously two doors down from the local Goat Whisperers shop, which I remember going to staff meetings in years and years ago. Hands down Warboar is a better shop.
Here is a map for it if you want to go along, a local NCP carpark had plenty of spaces to park and just nextdoor as well. Can't recommend the place enough, if you're in south east London get your bum down there and play some games, you should always support your FLGS!
Warboars site is here and Facebook page here
Below are the tournament results I got sent
afterward and the table makes for some interesting reading:
Player | Faction | Game 1 TPs | Game 2 TPs | Game 3 TPs | VPs for | Vps against | VP diff | Total TPs |
Jon Chaddock | Shaltari | 20 | 20 | 20 | 117 | 14 | 103 | 60 |
Alex Barton | UCM | 12 | 13 | 18 | 65 | 34 | 31 | 43 |
Hawk Andrew | PHR | 11 | 10 | 15 | 77 | 60 | 17 | 36 |
Matt Duran | UCM | 9 | 16 | 10 | 89 | 63 | 26 | 35 |
Ed Scullion | PHR | 10 | 10 | 14 | 39 | 29 | 10 | 34 |
Hawk Liam | UCM | 8 | 10 | 15 | 53 | 47 | 6 | 33 |
Hawk Sean | Shaltari | 16 | 0 | 16 | 47 | 43 | 4 | 32 |
Hawk Dave | UCM | 10 | 12 | 10 | 62 | 61 | 1 | 32 |
Ian James | Scourge | 4 | 10 | 16 | 69 | 68 | 1 | 30 |
Chris Lubodzini | Scourge | 6 | 8 | 16 | 53 | 56 | -3 | 30 |
Azad Nandoo | Shaltari | 14 | 16 | 0 | 30 | 58 | -28 | 30 |
Neil Harris | PHR | 11 | 7 | 11 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 29 |
Xavier Lindsey | PHR | 10 | 8 | 9 | 42 | 53 | -11 | 27 |
Daniel Brown | Scourge | 10 | 15 | 2 | 44 | 62 | -18 | 27 |
Hawk Darren | Scourge | 7 | 12 | 6 | 36 | 48 | -12 | 25 |
Chris Pratchett | Scourge | 9 | 10 | 5 | 45 | 59 | -14 | 24 |
Joe Whiddet | UCM | 13 | 4 | 5 | 41 | 58 | -17 | 22 |
Rob Wallace | Scourge | 10 | 5 | 4 | 24 | 48 | -24 | 19 |
Tony Brown | Scourge | 10 | 4 | 4 | 43 | 83 | -40 | 18 |
Mike Tamiolo | Shaltari | 0 | 10 | 4 | 56 | 98 | -42 | 14 |
From this we can see that despite Scourge having
the most players the highest they got was 9th, now part of
that could be put down to players or maybe other reasons but it does
still surprise me to see that many scourge in the bottom half. But
much like the Scourge in DZC they are a very refined army to play as,
both fragile and yet merciless on the attack so this could explain
their rather poor placing. UCM had a very strong showing in the
tournament having the largest faction presence in the top 10. PHR did
pretty solidly considering their small numbers, and the Shaltari
players had some of the largest points games under their belt. The
final game top table game was between Jon Chaddock and Azad Nandoo,
and Jon Chaddock battered the player who previously had had a very
strong showing in the other two games. Showing Shaltari to be a very
very good faction in the game, one of those factions much like the
scourge that are tricky to master but once you know their advantages
you can really push them hard to make up for their factional
weaknesses. Also Jon Chaddock's list had 21 Glass in it which were
throwing out 105 shots a turn which was clearly not to be sniffed at,
and prompted some raised eyebrows in the Hawk team.
The new Dropfleet Command Cards were a lot of fun some very fluffy things in there and they all very much fitted within their respective factions play style and thematic background. Especially the scourge deck, which got a few grumbles just because of how much it messes with the opponent! The PHR deck had a strong showing and really pushed the toughness of the faction in a fun way, the decks bring in some of the rules that so far hadn't had a ship attached to them so that opens up some cool possibilities for the future. I'm really excited to get my hands on the full production decks when they come out.
Anyway I really enjoyed the event and I'm looking forward to seeing the deveolpments in the near future. (Fingers crossed PHR get all the linked guns in the world!)
Let me know what you think in the comments below about the tournament results.
Any surprises there? Or has this confirmed some suspicions of yours?
Thank you for your effort of filming and commenting. I wonder how many points were played?
ReplyDelete1250
DeleteI saw Dave's list when he was painting it at LVO, and wondered if his low strike carrier count was a fluke or mistake. Hearing that other Hawk guys also play with such low, low, strike carrier count REALLY surprises me! I feel like you need at least 8+ because you're going to lose some, and if that happens then you just like... don't have any presence at a cluster? That seems so illogical to me when the victory conditions (and fluff!) are all about landing boots on the ground. When the Phoenix group brought to LVO 3-4 motherships (with enough gates to use them), or 8 Medea and 3 Troopships... we dominated because our opponents brought lists like Hawk makes and just couldn't keep up with the ground game where the VP comes from.
ReplyDeleteI'm rambling, I guess my general wondering was something about if the game was played and balanced by Hawk with 4-5 strike carriers in mind? Were they assuming players wouldn't emphasize the part that generates VP? Are we breaking it by bringing so much ground game?
Considering the Shaltari TP breaks so widely - either they get shut out or they essentially shut out their opponent - definitely suggests they need a closer balance pass, particularly when you see that none of the three other factions show the same trend to that extreme.
ReplyDeleteIt may just be the glass - the winning list seems to be mostly glass and troop deployment, and utterly obliterated all other lists.
DeleteKeep in mind that the Glass list played all 3 of the other Shaltari players, leading to their associated "0" TP scores. Looking at their other games indicates that their scores were closer to average.
DeleteI am headed to the UKGEXPO tournament in June with my UCM, can't wait! Thanks for the write-up.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure I would play against someone that bought a 'gamey' list like the glass more than once, I don't mind losing but I'm not a big fan of min/max spam that seeks to bend the rules.
The lists I am working on are light on troop deployment - 1/2 troopships and between 2 and 4 strike carriers - but that's because I want to play a game involving spaceships shooting each other, not a glorified bus service.